Romania is the loser.

“This is not just an electoral victory, it is a victory of Romanian dignity. It is the victory of those who have not lost hope, of those who still believe in Romania, a free, respected, sovereign country,” George Simion, the presidential candidate of Romania, said.

No! That is not true.

This is not a victory for Romania — it is a victory for geopolitical manipulation over a poor, genuine Romanian people who are on their knees, filled with frustration and resentment toward a corrupt Romanian government playing dirty games within the European Union.

Romania was played. Romanians were manipulated!

If Simion and Georgescu win, Romania will lose its independence and slide back into a system of overcontrol, reminiscent of communism.

Romania’s fate has been gambled between two major powers — and sadly, its destiny seems not to matter.

Romanians appear to want communism again.

“In 2018, a small man from powerful political circles asked a private nurse, ‘What are your people looking forward to?’
‘Communism,’ I replied.”

And communism will be! He was a spy! A very dirty and intelligent spy!

Romanians are simple minds genuine souls, they want to return home, to something familiar with no corruption — and that is exactly what they will get: sovereignty wrapped in authoritarianism. No seen corruption!

And that’s fine. If they voted for it, then that is what they will have.

Dirty intelligence played Romania!

But when Romanians finally will wake up and realize how they were manipulated — by whom, and for what reasons — it will be too late.

You cannot fight communism once it has settled in. You simply live with it.

We lived it! I live it!

Romania has been gambled away in these geopolitical power games.

It has become the “carte perdant” — the losing card — thrown to whoever offered the right price. All small countries are!


With Simion and Georgescu, Romania will not gain sovereignty and freedom.
This is Romania’s tragedy.

What it will gain is control — and a return to communism.

But if that’s what the people want, then so be it.

Manipulated democracy pushing Romanians to communism.

They deserve what they voted for — to be manipulated, used, and exploited in others’ geopolitical strategies.

In the next two weeks, Romanian intelligence services must wake up and THINK ROMANIAN!

Romania is caught in the middle of high-stakes geopolitical games.

And world leaders will do anything — listen carefully, anything, whether legal or illegal — to bargain away Romania’s future and sell it on the dirty political market.

Romania will not win.

It is a small country, caught between powerful forces and massive interests.

These major political players will manipulate the Romanian elections.

The deals are already made.

Simion and Georgescu may win — and will mark the end of Romania’s freedom.


Romanians, welcome back to communism.

There will be no TRUE democracy nor FREEDOM! .

You have no idea what you’re stepping into.

The hell of communism! You have no idea what it’s really about — but I lived through it for 10 years.
It is a hell where madness is normalized and treated as a virtue.

Dirty geopolitical games!

Who wants George Simion and AUR parti to win in Romania elections and why

made by Grok

The geopolitical context surrounding Romania’s presidential election rerun in May 2025, with George Simion and his far-right Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR) party as a leading contender, is complex.

Various actors, both domestic and international, may have interests in seeing Simion and AUR succeed, while others oppose their rise due to the party’s nationalist, Eurosceptic, and socially conservative platform. Below is a detailed analysis of who might want Simion and AUR to win, their motivations, and the broader implications, grounded in the current geopolitical landscape.



Domestic Actors Supporting Simion and AUR

  1. Disillusioned Romanian Voters (Anti-Establishment Sentiment)
    • Who: Young, urban men, working-class diaspora (especially in Italy, Spain, France, and Cyprus), and rural voters frustrated with Romania’s political establishment. Polls suggest AUR’s base includes low- to middle-income voters under 45, often with lower education levels.
    • Why:
      • Economic Discontent: Romania’s post-communist transition has left many feeling marginalized. Despite EU membership, economic inequality, corruption, and resource exploitation by foreign corporations fuel resentment. AUR’s anti-elite rhetoric, promising to prioritize “Romania first,” resonates with those who feel mainstream parties (like the Social Democrats (PSD) and National Liberals (PNL)) have failed to deliver prosperity.
      • Cultural Conservatism: AUR’s emphasis on family, Christian faith, and national identity appeals to voters opposed to progressive policies like same-sex marriage or “woke” cultural trends. Simion’s rejection of Holocaust education as a standalone subject and his anti-LGBTQ stance align with socially conservative segments.
      • Anti-System Anger: The annulment of the November 2024 presidential election, where far-right candidate Călin Georgescu led before being disqualified, deepened distrust in institutions. Simion has capitalized on this, framing the cancellation as a “coup” against the people’s will, rallying voters who feel democracy is under threat.
    • Details: AUR’s rapid rise—securing 9% in the 2020 parliamentary and doubling to 18.2% in 2024—stems from effective social media campaigns targeting the diaspora and youth. Simion’s promise to restore Romania’s pre-World War II borders (including parts of Moldova, Ukraine, and Bulgaria) taps into irredentist sentiments, though he insists unification (e.g., with Moldova) would require referendums and international agreement.
  2. Far-Right and Ultranationalist Groups in Romania
    • Who: Other far-right parties (e.g., S.O.S. Romania, though tensions exist with its leader Diana Șoșoacă) and ultranationalist movements, including those nostalgic for interwar nationalist figures.
    • Why:
      • Ideological Alignment: AUR’s platform, rooted in nationalism, Christian Orthodoxy, and anti-globalism, aligns with these groups’ goals. Simion’s environmentalism, framed as protecting Romania’s resources from foreign exploitation, adds a unique appeal.
      • Consolidation of Far-Right Votes: After Georgescu’s disqualification, Simion emerged as the primary far-right candidate, with Anamaria Gavrilă (Party of Young People) withdrawing to boost his chances. This consolidation reflects a strategic effort to unify nationalist voters.
    • Details: AUR’s rhetoric, including anti-vaccination and anti-restriction stances during COVID-19, has drawn in conspiracy-minded and anti-elite groups. However, Simion’s attempt to moderate some antisemitic and anti-vax rhetoric to appeal to broader voters has caused friction with harder-line factions.

International Actors Supporting Simion and AUR

  1. U.S. Far-Right and MAGA Movement
    • Who: Figures like Steve Bannon, Jack Posobiec, JD Vance, and Elon Musk, who have shown interest in Romania’s election. Simion has openly aligned AUR with Donald Trump’s MAGA movement.
    • Why:
      • Ideological Affinity: Simion’s “Romania first” rhetoric, Euroscepticism, and opposition to progressive policies mirror MAGA’s anti-globalist, nationalist stance. He has praised Trump’s leadership and seeks a “Make Europe Great Again” (MEGA) movement.
      • Geopolitical Strategy: Some U.S. conservatives view Simion as a counterweight to EU centralization and a potential ally in reducing European support for Ukraine. Simion’s pledge to halt military aid to Ukraine aligns with isolationist tendencies in parts of the Republican Party.
      • Election Narrative: The annulment of Romania’s November 2024 election, citing Russian interference, was criticized by JD Vance as “cancelling elections because you don’t like the result.” Simion has leveraged this to claim U.S. support, alleging ties with the State Department and other agencies.
    • Details: Simion’s U.S. connections include interviews with Bannon and Posobiec, and a reported $1.5 million lobbying effort to secure meetings with MAGA figures, though he denies a formal contract. These ties amplify his international legitimacy but risk alienating pro-EU Romanians, as 76% oppose leaving the EU and 80% support NATO.
  2. European Far-Right Movements
    • Who: Leaders like Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, and Poland’s former Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, who share AUR’s conservative and nationalist values. Simion has cited Meloni as a role model and was seen with Morawiecki during his candidacy filing.
    • Why:
      • Strengthening Far-Right in EU: A Simion victory would bolster the far-right bloc in the European Parliament, where parties like Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia and Orbán’s Fidesz push for less EU integration and more national sovereignty. AUR’s unaffiliated status allows flexibility to align with groups like the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR).
      • Regional Influence: Simion’s irredentist views on Moldova and Romanian minorities in Ukraine and Serbia align with Orbán’s advocacy for Hungarian minorities, potentially creating a bloc of nationalist states in Eastern Europe.
      • Anti-Brussels Sentiment: Simion’s criticism of the EU’s “greedy, corrupt bubble” echoes Orbán’s clashes with Brussels, appealing to leaders seeking to reform or weaken EU institutions.
    • Details: Simion’s attendance at conservative events, like Atreju 2024 with Meloni, signals his integration into this network. However, his hostile stance toward Romania’s Hungarian minority sets him apart from Orbán, limiting full alignment.
  3. Russia (Speculative and Contested)
    • Who: Russian actors seeking to destabilize NATO and EU unity, though Simion denies pro-Russian leanings and has called Putin a “war criminal.”
    • Why:
      • Weakening NATO/EU: Simion’s opposition to military aid for Ukraine and his Euroscepticism could reduce Romania’s role as a NATO bulwark on the Black Sea, benefiting Russia’s regional interests. The annulment of the November 2024 election was attributed to Russian “hybrid actions,” suggesting prior Kremlin interest in far-right candidates like Georgescu.
      • Exploiting Discontent: Russia has historically amplified far-right movements in Europe to sow division. AUR’s anti-elite and anti-EU rhetoric provides fertile ground, even if Simion publicly distances himself from Moscow.
    • Details: Allegations of Russian meddling in the 2024 election, including TikTok promotion of Georgescu, raise concerns about similar tactics supporting Simion. However, Simion’s pro-U.S. stance and NATO support (albeit with a “Romania first” caveat) complicate this narrative. Without concrete evidence, Russian support remains speculative but plausible given geopolitical patterns.

Why These Actors Want Simion/AUR to Win: Broader Geopolitical Implications

  1. Shifting Romania’s Foreign Policy
    • A Simion presidency could tilt Romania away from its pro-Western orientation, despite his stated support for NATO and EU membership. His pledge to stop military aid to Ukraine and renegotiate Romania’s role in these organizations threatens cohesion in both. This appeals to actors like the U.S. far-right and European nationalists who prioritize national sovereignty over multilateral commitments.
  2. Destabilizing the EU
    • Simion’s Euroscepticism and alignment with Meloni and Orbán could strengthen the far-right’s influence in the EU, challenging Brussels’ authority. His environmentalism, framed as anti-colonial resistance to foreign resource exploitation, resonates with voters but clashes with EU green policies, potentially fueling populist backlash.
  3. Exploiting Anti-Establishment Anger
    • The annulment of the 2024 election, economic woes, and distrust in institutions create a volatile environment where Simion’s populist rhetoric thrives. Domestic supporters and international far-right allies see this as an opportunity to reshape Romania’s political landscape, mirroring trends in Hungary and Poland.
  4. Irredentist Ambitions
    • Simion’s push for unification with Moldova and support for Romanian minorities in Ukraine and Serbia appeals to nationalists but risks regional tensions. European far-right leaders like Orbán may back this to justify similar claims, while Russia could exploit resulting instability.

Opposing Forces and Counterarguments

  • Pro-EU and Pro-NATO Romanians: Polls show 76% of Romanians oppose leaving the EU, and 80% support NATO. Mainstream candidates like Crin Antonescu, Nicușor Dan, and Elena Lasconi campaign on a “practical vote” to block Simion, fearing his policies could isolate Romania.
  • EU and NATO Leadership: A Simion victory could weaken Romania’s role as a NATO bulwark and EU member, alarming Brussels and Washington’s pro-alliance factions.
  • Romania’s Hungarian Minority and Neighbors: Simion’s anti-Hungarian rhetoric and irredentist views strain relations with Hungary, Moldova, and Ukraine, where he is persona non grata.
  • Moderates within AUR: Simion’s shift toward broader appeal risks alienating hardline supporters, potentially fracturing his base.

Conclusion

George Simion and AUR’s potential victory in Romania’s May 2025 presidential election is supported by a coalition of domestic and international actors united by anti-establishment, nationalist, and conservative ideologies. Domestically, disillusioned voters and far-right groups see Simion as a champion against corruption and cultural drift. Internationally, the U.S. MAGA movement, European far-right leaders like Meloni and Orbán, and potentially Russia (though less directly) view his rise as a chance to advance their agendas—whether reshaping the EU, reducing aid to Ukraine, or destabilizing Western unity. However, strong pro-EU and pro-NATO sentiment in Romania, coupled with regional tensions, poses significant hurdles. Simion’s success hinges on sustaining his populist momentum while navigating the geopolitical tightrope between Western alliances and nationalist ambitions.

I don’t want to become you!

It’s 8:20 AM, and after a night of barely any sleep—spent desperately searching for a way to escape this socialist-organized crime and corruption gulag—I’m on my way to my $30, two-hour job after taxes.

We’re forced to feed the socialist government and their organized crime friends with our labor.

Corruption runs rampant!

I have just 20 cents in my bank account—not even enough to buy a coffee.

Meanwhile, the white-collar cartel sleeps soundly in their beds.

Well, except for one: my stalker! He knows my every move—when I leave, when I return—and he just stalks me. It’s that simple!

If I point out that this is tied to dirty, Jewish-related organized crime, will that make me an antisemite?

In a socialist system, it sure would!

How many Ukrainians, Russians, or Jews are involved?

How many Americans have laundered money this way in Ukraine?

Are they trying to create a little Israel there?

What does Russia want? What do Ukrainians want?

And today, what does the USA want?

People are dying!
People are being stalked and hunted by deranged minds who feel entitled to take out their anger on the innocent!

They demand to be first in everything!

I don’t want the top spot, nor do I want to be harassed by those who feel entitled to mess with a genuine, innocent person like me.

I just want a free, decent life—working and living for something honest and fair.

But here, in socialism, only criminals, corrupt officials, and the entitled can have that.

All of Europe is on edge because of this!

Every single country wants to end corruption within its borders! Look at Serbia, Ukraine, Romania, Poland, Hungary, Italy, France—all of them! Corruption and dirty games by insane leaders have pushed people too far! They’re fighting for freedom from corruption!

What they can’t see is that an anti-corruption leader won’t emerge as long as they’re part of the EU—a highly corrupt system itself.
True freedom means freedom from the EU.

But how can you break free from the EU when you’re poor?

It’s like leaving a corrupt, crazy neighborhood with no money to find a decent place to live!

Corruption traps people!

And corrupt environments breed more corruption!

Why do people tolerate corruption in their countries?

It’s like me watching my stalker torment me and smilling with a police car looking at it, powerless to stop him because he’s part of an organized crime family network.

It’s as simple as that!

“War is coming! The command of the Romanian Army, handed over to foreign troops.”

Analysis of the Claim: “Vine războiul! Comanda Armatei Române, cedată trupelor străine”

Claim Evaluation: The statement “Vine războiul! Comanda Armatei Române, cedată trupelor străine” translates to “War is coming! The command of the Romanian Army, handed over to foreign troops.”

This claim suggests a potentially alarming scenario involving the transfer of military command to foreign entities, which could be interpreted as a loss of national sovereignty or an indication of imminent conflict.

Context and Recent Developments:

  • Legislative Changes: Recent legislative proposals in Romania, as discussed in the web results, highlight amendments to the national defense laws. A key point is the establishment of operational command transfer to allied or coalition forces during joint missions. This is outlined in documents from the Ministry of National Defense (MApN) focusing on adapting Romanian legislation to NATO and EU membership requirements.
  • Military Cooperation: Romania’s participation in NATO implies a level of military integration where multinational command structures can be employed in operations. This is not unique to Romania but is a standard practice among NATO members for ensuring coordinated and effective military actions. However, the claim frames this cooperation in a context suggesting a more drastic or permanent cession of command, which is not supported by the legislative texts.

True or False:

  • Legal Framework: The legislative proposals do mention the potential for command transfer under specific conditions like joint missions or operations, but this is within the context of NATO and EU cooperation, not a blanket cession of command in peacetime or without consent. Thus, the claim exaggerates the situation by implying an unconditional or permanent transfer of command.
  • Intent and Reality: There’s no evidence from public sources that Romania is preparing for an imminent war where its command structure would be completely handed over to foreign troops. The legislative adjustments are aimed at improving operational compatibility with allies, not at relinquishing national control over its military.

Manipulation or Disinformation:

  • Manipulation: The phrasing “cedată trupelor străine” (ceded to foreign troops) suggests a betrayal or loss of sovereignty, which could be intended to stir nationalistic sentiments or fear. This is a manipulation of the actual legislative intent, which is more about enhancing operational effectiveness in international missions.
  • Disinformation: The claim might be considered disinformation if it’s intentionally spread to mislead the public about the true nature of Romania’s military cooperation and legislative adjustments. It does not reflect the balanced and conditional nature of command transfer in military alliances but rather frames it as an automatic loss of national control.

Conclusion:

While the statement has roots in real legislative changes regarding military cooperation within NATO frameworks, it is largely a case of manipulation and potential disinformation. The exaggeration lies in portraying these changes as an imminent, unilateral transfer of national command to foreign entities, which is not the intent or outcome of the legislative proposals.

  • Sources of Concern: The narrative could be exploited by groups or individuals with an agenda to undermine trust in national defense policies or to promote anti-NATO sentiment.
  • Public Discourse: It’s crucial for public discourse to involve clear, factual communication about such laws to avoid misinformation.

In summary, while there are elements of truth in terms of legal changes for military cooperation, the claim as presented is manipulative in its framing, suggesting a more dire and less accurate scenario than what the legislation actually entails.

Călin Georgescu’s Mental Marathon into Presidential Fitness

When it comes to running a country, cognitive and emotional stability are kind of a big deal.

In the case of Călin Georgescu, whose bold proclamations and unconventional worldview are more TikTok than reality, there’s an entertaining yet serious conversation to be had about what happens when leadership takes a detour into fantasy land.


Risky Decisions: A Rollercoaster Ride of Statetments

An emotionally unstable leader can take us on a joyride of impulsive and poorly informed decisions.

In Georgescu’s case, his solutions range from “vaccinate with cold water” to calling NATO a “conflict promoter.” Such statements don’t just lack coherence; they’re practically scripts for a satire show.

Translation into Reality:
The potential for mismanagement during public health crises or national security threats could be shocking. Imagine trying to address global diplomacy with “the only real science is Jesus Christ” as your guiding principle—it’s both bold and confuse.


Crisis Management: Or Lack of it?

Presidents are the go-to crisis managers. Whether it’s economic instability or a foreign policy mess, the ability to react calmly and rationally under stress is critical.

Unfortunately, Georgescu’s responses—like suggesting Ukraine’s Zelenskyy is “bad for his country” while praising Russia’s “wisdom”—suggest a passion for stress-induced mistakes.

Satirical Angle:
Picture this: A hypothetical invasion scenario where Georgescu reassures citizens with, “We’re in God’s hands, not NATO’s.” A spiritual Tiktok talk, sure—but not exactly what you’d want to hear during a geopolitical crisis.


Manipulability: Who’s Really in Charge?

Unstable individuals are often easier to manipulate, making them a risk for falling prey to external influences. Georgescu’s admiration for Russian policies and skepticism of Western alliances hint at an openness to narratives that could jeopardize national sovereignty.

Humorous Take:
Imagine the Romanian parliament receiving policy drafts written in old Cyrillic because “Russia wisdom” had a guiding hand. It’s absurd but raises genuine concerns.


Public Confidence: Down the Rabbit Hole

Leaders perceived as unstable risk eroding public trust. Whether it’s promoting controversial WWII figures or dismissing scientific consensus, Georgescu’s declarations start polarizing debates that could destabilize national unity.

The Meme-ification of Leadership:
Georgescu’s approach ensures his presidency would be meme diamond—but at what cost?

Ridiculing your ALLIES might be fun for Tiktok or with your drank and crazy friends but it’s less enjoyable when ROMANIA’s credibility on the global stage goes down.


Polarization and Protests

A president with significant mental health concerns can amplify divisions within society, leading to protests and unrest.

Georgescu’s fiery rhetoric, from “Romania is a slave of the West” to praising Russia, might mobilize fringe groups while alienating moderates.


Economic Stability: A Comedy of Errors

Investor confidence often depends on predictable leadership.

Georgescu’s rejection of “Western enslavement” and promotion of economic isolationism might scare off foreign investors faster than you can say “recession.”

Funny Hypothetical:
A global business summit where Georgescu presents a PowerPoint titled Why Trade Is Overrated, complete with slides on subsistence farming and cold water plunges.


Security Risks: Diplomatic Disaster in the Making

From calling NATO unnecessary to praising a rival superpower, Georgescu’s foreign policy stances don’t just raise eyebrows—they might also raise alarms among allies.


Potential Solutions: From Comedy to Constitutional Cleanup

  1. Mental Health Evaluations for Leaders:
    Georgescu’s statements suggest the need for thorough screening processes before elections. Running a country isn’t open mic night.
  2. Legislative Interventions:
    If TikTok rhetoric becomes policy, parliament might need mechanisms to step in and steady the ship.

Conclusion: A Presidential Plotline from the Twilight Zone

While Călin Georgescu’s leadership style may entertain, it also highlights the serious risks of unfit leadership.

From impulsive decision-making to eroded public trust, the stakes are too high to ignore—even if the comedy writes itself.

“My WAY” – Shifting the psychopathic narcissistic power

Every single time I say “the narcissist,” my mind goes to my mom’s death. Left to die, refusing her care, he turned his back on her, slept in the same bed, and left her to die. By morning, she was dead!

This isn’t just a narcissist or psychopath; it’s more than that — it’s a killer!

And in every single narcissistic psychopath, there’s a killer ready to destroy anyone who refuses to do things “HIS/HER WAY.”

You can’t fight it because you’re ALWAYS alone, and the psychopaths are TOGETHER! Don’t even try to talk to them about GOD; they don’t believe in it. God is only for them when it’s part of their way. Don’t talk to them about HELL because they don’t believe in that either!

Don’t talk to them about your pain and suffering because they don’t believe in it!

They don’t know right from wrong, and as soon as wrong serves their interests, it’s perfectly right!

Highly mentally sick, if they can’t use you, they will destroy you and everything you are.

And then the story!

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

/

Why did the Ukrainian war start? What if my “fiction” story is a TRUE story?

If you want to stop a war, you MUST know why and how the war started! More than a long history are those facts!

I keep asking myself, why doesn’t RUSSIA make these facts public? Talking about their closed-door negotiations with “the Nazi groups” who played them!

A dream of a Nazi Ukrainian group is to liberate Ukraine. But if you are a psychopathic Nazi narcissist, you will play your way toward it, destroying your “enemy”!

It’s like how my mom died! Assured that she was loved. Assured that she was safe!

I am not part of any services, no affiliation, and no support for any power involved.

I just know how a narcissist thinks and works “HIS WAY.”

Why doesn’t the narcissist want ANYTHING to belong to him at death time?

Because EVERYTHING he had didn’t belong to him but to someone else, from whom HE STOLE.

Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

Today I told him! “You are nothing; my mom was everything! You gaslighted, destroyed her, alienated her, messed with her life and mind, secluded her, abused her, TURNED HER AGAINST people who loved her, to have ultimate control over her and KILL HER!”

He laughed, “I was everything; your mom was nothing without me!”

She would be ALIVE without you!

Then I realized what happened with RUSSIA and the NAZIS.

The Nazis alienated Russia from its supporters. After, I believe there was an alliance behind closed doors. And after Russia realized it was being played in these dirty Nazi games, it attacked UKRAINE.

They didn’t attack UKRAINE; they attacked the Nazis from UKRAINE.

My mom lost her strength and was bed-bound when she realized my father’s games.

He cut off all her support networks and controlled all communication, including calls and people who entered her room. The same happened with Russia. Nazis did it!

But Russia was competent to fight against it! They attacked Ukraine! But they didn’t attack it. They attacked THE NAZIS who were playing games in and with Ukraine.

When my mom called me to save her, and I started fighting with my NAZI father, he started to beat me. And called for support all his flying monkeys. In front of my children’s eyes!

Putin fights a Nazi narcissist group in UKRAINE, supported by its flying monkeys.

Ukraine is not alone! Russia is!

Because as strange as it looks, THE NARCISSISTIC NAZI is hidden, allied with “mom Russia support.”

My mom died not because of my Nazi narcissist father but because she TURNED AGAINST HER, or cut all her support. Except for me!

But far away and poor, I couldn’t save her!

Photo by Thgusstavo Santana on Pexels.com

Now the fight is back! One of my mom’s “dirty” flying monkeys, the strongest one even if it let mom die, now she wants MOST of the “world” power. And she attacked the NAZI narcissist and the other flying monkeys.

I can’t bring my mom back! They killed her together! But what I can do is support this powerful flying monkey to present to the world what a NARCISSIST NAZI could do to people.

I am destroyed! Like life, career, and human being. They killed my mom, destroyed my family, took over my life, controlled me, messed with me. No life but A GOD! But what I can do is to make CLEAR from where the mess started and why.

And how a dirty NAZI NARCISSIST destroyed a world, a family, good genuine people.

Money? I don’t take dirty money coming from bloody hands.

If I could live free, I would make my honest money. But I can’t.

The war can be stopped. If Russia has the intelligence and courage to tell the world THE TRUE STORY about the psychopathic narcissist Nazi group in UKRAINE and put herself in the vulnerable position of why they attacked UKRAINE, peace will come.

Because RUSSIA wants peace, the power flying monkey wants to take over controlling the world power, and the psychopathic Nazi narcissist MUST give up on his power games. The poles of power will be switched in the world.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

As for me, I will stay as always with the one who will have less power and less money. Because I am too old to learn a new language! ;).

Million roses are not money, but roses!

Photo by picjumbo.com on Pexels.com

/https://youtu.be/ZS64OA5QxsI?si=uCTSFkwL9zK0ikBY